Many have challenged our stand on Blood transfusions because such ones claim that the prohibition on blood refers only to eating blood. But is that true? Does the Christian prohibition on blood only extend to eating blood? Let us take a close look at all the scriptures relevant to this stand and not just the few that our opposers like to exclusively focus in on. A Decision by the Apostles Jehovah's Witnesses stand by the standard set by the first century Christians. This was the result of a decision based upon whether non-Jewish Christians from among the nations were under obligation to observe the law. The first century centralized body of apostles and elders in Jerusalem, (Acts 15:2) by the influence of the holy spirit, (Acts 15:28) concluded that there were three things in the law that were still binding upon all Christians because they precede the Law of Moses. (Acts 15:29) This was no doubt because they were restrictions on all of mankind that existed before the law an...

Following are articles that provide facts in support of bloodless medicine as superior to blood transfusions. If you know of other articles in support of bloodless medicine, please provide them in a comment below and I will add them to this list. (Be sure to provide the direct link to the article and not a front page.) For a discussion of the Scriptural, spiritual, logical and medical reasons we have to reject blood transfusions, see the post Do the Scriptures Really Take a Stand on Blood Transfusions? . As shown in this Englewood Hospital promossional video , our stand has revolutionized modern medicine in ways demonstrated in the list of links below. However, there are irresponsible individuals both in the medical community and among our opposers who would see this progress haulted for their own selfish reasons. Who Is At Fault for the Mortality Rates? Imagine a man is in a desert both starving and thirsting and he comes across a diner in the desert. There he orders a glass of w...